Welcome to TIA News!

Your go-to destination for the latest industry insights, TIA-curated content, and up-to-date news about 3PL. Whether you're looking for expert analysis, breaking stories, or in-depth features, we're excited to have you here! 

 

Looking for TIA members-only resources like education courses? Click the button below.

 

 

 

 

TIA Blog

Is That Image Real? A Broker’s Field Guide to Spotting Fake Photos

a traffic safety marker on the side of a road

Share

A manipulated truck photo, a screenshot of a document passed off as the real thing, an AI-generated “proof” of a load, fake imagery is cheap, fast, and getting more accurate everyday. With the right tools and the right questions, you don’t need a degree in forensics to spot them.

Google has been doing serious computer vision work for well over a decade, and in practice their Gemini models are the strongest at this kind of image forensics. Arm yourself with a few key terms to turn a basic prompt like “is this real?” into a real assessment.

A handful of vocabulary words dramatically improve what the model gives back:

Spoof / second-generation image: a photo of a photo, or a photo of a screen, rather than a direct capture. Tells include screen bezels, a pixel grid, refresh lines, a rectangular border framing the content, a moiré pattern (those wavy, rainbow-like artifacts you see when you photograph a screen), or glare bands that don’t match the geometry of the scene.

Lighting and shadow consistency: Ask whether shadows fall in a direction consistent with the light source and whether reflections make physical sense. AI-generated images get this subtly wrong: shadows pointing different ways, impossible reflections, unnaturally clean or slightly warped text, edges that seem to float.

Confidence score: Instead of forcing a black or white answer, ask the model how confident it is and why. Making it show its work tells you what it actually saw. Keep in mind that a model that flags every photo as fake is technically right about the fakes but it’s useless to you. Push for a score and not a verdict.

Next time an image looks off, paste it into Gemini with this:

You are an image forensics analyst. For the image I provide, tell me: (1) Is this a direct photo of a real object or scene, or a “second-generation” image. Look for screen bezels, a pixel grid, moiré patterns, refresh lines, a rectangular border around the content, or glare that doesn’t match the scene. (2) Are there signs it was AI-generated or edited? Look for shadows or reflections inconsistent with the light source, unnaturally clean or warped text, mismatched blur, or floating/duplicated elements. (3) Give a confidence score from 0 to 1 for each and a one-line reason. Important: a merely blurry or dark photo is not a fake, only flag indicators you can actually see.

AI image generation gets better every month, and detection will never be perfect. Treat it as one signal, not a verdict. Combine it with the context around the image. Was the person responsive in conversation, then suddenly took 30 minutes to “send a quick photo”? Does the story hold together? The model tells you what’s in the pixels. Your judgment about everything around them is still the most important tool you have.

Tell Us What You Think!

Have a question? Ideas for new content? TIA wants your thoughts on this new resource and how it can better serve our members.

Send Feedback

© 2026